What you'll receive
Attorneys waste hours reviewing lengthy witness statements and deposition transcripts, struggling to extract critical facts, identify contradictions, and assess credibility across multiple witnesses. Manual review is time-consuming, inconsistent, and risks missing key evidentiary issues that could impact case strategy or trial outcomes.
Attorneys waste hours reviewing lengthy witness statements and deposition transcripts, struggling to extract critical facts, identify contradictions, and assess credibility across multiple witnesses. Manual review is time-consuming, inconsistent, and risks missing key evidentiary issues that could impact case strategy or trial outcomes.
CaseMark automatically analyzes witness statements to generate comprehensive summaries highlighting key testimony, credibility factors, and evidentiary concerns. Get structured, consistent summaries that reveal contradictions, admissions, and strategic opportunities across all witnesses in minutes instead of hours.
This workflow is applicable across multiple practice areas and use cases
Criminal defense attorneys must analyze witness statements from law enforcement, victims, alibi witnesses, and character witnesses to build defense strategies and prepare for cross-examination.
Witness credibility assessment and statement analysis are fundamental to criminal defense work, directly impacting case outcomes and trial preparation.
Personal injury cases heavily rely on witness statements from accident witnesses, medical professionals, and expert witnesses to establish liability and damages.
Witness testimony is critical evidence in personal injury litigation, requiring systematic analysis and preparation for depositions and trial testimony.
Employment litigation requires analysis of witness statements from coworkers, supervisors, and HR personnel regarding discrimination, harassment, or wrongful termination claims.
Witness testimony from workplace participants is essential evidence in employment disputes, requiring careful preparation and credibility assessment for depositions and trial.
Commercial litigation involves analyzing witness statements from business partners, employees, and industry experts regarding contract disputes, fraud claims, and business torts.
Complex commercial cases depend on witness testimony to establish facts about business dealings, making systematic statement analysis crucial for trial preparation.
Family law cases utilize witness statements from family members, therapists, and social workers in custody disputes, divorce proceedings, and domestic violence matters.
Witness credibility is particularly important in family law where testimony about parenting fitness, domestic situations, and child welfare directly influences court decisions.
CaseMark can process any witness-related document including deposition transcripts, witness statements, affidavits, sworn declarations, interview notes, and recorded testimony transcriptions. The system works with standard formats like PDF, Word documents, and text files, extracting relevant testimony regardless of document length or formatting.
CaseMark analyzes witness statements for credibility indicators including inconsistencies with other testimony, hedging language, certainty levels, internal contradictions, and corroboration gaps. The system flags qualifying statements like 'I think' or 'maybe,' notes changes in detail level across topics, and cross-references factual assertions against other witness accounts when multiple statements are uploaded.
Yes, CaseMark can analyze multiple witness statements simultaneously to identify contradictions, corroborating testimony, and conflicting accounts of the same events. When processing multiple witnesses, the system organizes findings both by individual witness and by topic or chronology, making it easy to spot conflicts and patterns across all testimony.
CaseMark reduces witness statement review from 3-4 hours per statement to approximately 8 minutes, a 95% time savings. This allows attorneys to process dozens of witness statements in the time it would traditionally take to review just one, while maintaining consistency and thoroughness that's difficult to achieve with manual review.
Each summary includes an executive overview, witness background, chronological account of events, key factual assertions, evidentiary analysis, credibility assessment, admissibility concerns, contradictions and admissions, corroboration opportunities, recommended follow-up questions, and strategic implications. This structure ensures you have everything needed for deposition prep, cross-examination, or trial strategy development.