What you'll receive
Criminal defense attorneys spend hours manually reviewing lengthy police reports to extract key facts, identify witnesses, and spot inconsistencies. This time-consuming process delays case assessment and strategy development. Critical details can be overlooked when reviewing multiple incident reports under tight deadlines.
Criminal defense attorneys spend hours manually reviewing lengthy police reports to extract key facts, identify witnesses, and spot inconsistencies. This time-consuming process delays case assessment and strategy development. Critical details can be overlooked when reviewing multiple incident reports under tight deadlines.
CaseMark automatically analyzes police reports and generates comprehensive summaries with chronological timelines, witness information, evidence details, and flagged discrepancies. Get organized, citation-ready summaries in minutes that preserve exact quotes and highlight potential Brady material, enabling faster case evaluation and stronger defense strategies.
This workflow is applicable across multiple practice areas and use cases
Police reports are essential evidence in personal injury cases involving vehicle accidents, slip and falls, or other incidents requiring law enforcement documentation to establish liability and causation.
Personal injury attorneys routinely analyze police reports to determine fault, identify witnesses, and build cases for their clients who were injured in accidents documented by law enforcement.
Police reports serve as foundational evidence across various civil litigation matters including premises liability, assault and battery claims, fraud cases, and disputes requiring documented incident details.
Many civil litigation cases rely on police reports to establish facts, timelines, and witness accounts for incidents that may lead to lawsuits beyond criminal prosecution.
Police reports document workplace violence incidents, harassment complaints escalated to law enforcement, or criminal conduct by employees that form the basis of employment litigation claims.
Employment attorneys need to review police reports when workplace incidents involve criminal behavior, assault, theft, or other law enforcement interventions that support wrongful termination, hostile work environment, or negligent supervision claims.
Police reports document incidents at healthcare facilities including patient altercations, theft of controlled substances, abuse allegations, or HIPAA violations requiring law enforcement involvement.
Healthcare attorneys and compliance officers review police reports when incidents at medical facilities trigger regulatory investigations, licensing issues, or civil liability concerns requiring legal analysis.
CaseMark analyzes the narrative structure, timestamps, and factual assertions across all uploaded reports to identify contradictions between officer accounts, discrepancies in witness statements, and gaps in documentation. The system flags variations in key details like times, locations, sequences of events, and descriptions of evidence. All identified inconsistencies are highlighted in the summary with specific page references to the source documents.
Yes, CaseMark is designed to process multiple reports simultaneously and cross-reference them for comprehensive analysis. When you upload the initial incident report along with supplemental reports, follow-up investigations, or reports from different responding officers, the system creates a unified timeline while noting where accounts differ. This is particularly valuable for identifying which officers witnessed specific events and where documentation may be contradictory.
CaseMark can analyze incident reports, arrest reports, investigation summaries, supplemental reports, officer narratives, witness statement forms, evidence logs, and related law enforcement documentation. The system works with standard police report formats from various jurisdictions and can process both narrative-style reports and form-based documentation. Multiple document types can be uploaded together for comprehensive analysis.
CaseMark summaries maintain strict fidelity to source documents and include specific page citations for verification. The system distinguishes between factual observations, witness accounts, and officer opinions, preserving exact quotes where legally significant. While summaries are highly accurate and designed for legal professional use, attorneys should verify critical facts against source documents as part of standard practice, which is facilitated by the included page references.
Yes, CaseMark is programmed to flag information that may constitute exculpatory evidence, including witness statements that contradict the prosecution theory, officer observations of defendant cooperation, evidence of alternative suspects, or documentation gaps that favor the defense. The system also highlights procedural concerns that may impact admissibility. However, legal judgment about Brady obligations and disclosure strategy remains with the attorney.