What you'll receive
Employment attorneys waste hours manually reviewing complaint documents, witness statements, and personnel files to understand workplace allegations. Extracting key facts, identifying legal risks, and building chronologies from scattered documentation is tedious and time-consuming, delaying case assessment and strategic response.
Employment attorneys waste hours manually reviewing complaint documents, witness statements, and personnel files to understand workplace allegations. Extracting key facts, identifying legal risks, and building chronologies from scattered documentation is tedious and time-consuming, delaying case assessment and strategic response.
CaseMark automatically analyzes employee complaints and supporting documentation to generate comprehensive summaries with chronologies, legal claims, evidence assessment, and risk analysis. Get a complete picture of workplace grievances in minutes, enabling faster case evaluation and strategic decision-making.
This workflow is applicable across multiple practice areas and use cases
Employment counsel reviewing complaints to assess risks before finalizing employment agreements, separation packages, or consulting arrangements that may be impacted by pending grievances.
Transactional employment attorneys need to understand existing complaints and workplace issues when drafting employment contracts, severance agreements, and settlement documents to mitigate future litigation risks.
Healthcare organizations analyzing employee complaints related to workplace safety, discrimination, or retaliation in medical settings where regulatory compliance intersects with employment law.
Healthcare employers face unique employment complaints involving HIPAA, patient safety, and regulatory compliance issues that require coordinated analysis of both employment and healthcare regulatory concerns.
Financial institutions reviewing employee complaints for potential regulatory reporting obligations and assessing workplace issues that could trigger FINRA, SEC, or banking regulator scrutiny.
Financial services firms must analyze employment complaints through both employment law and regulatory lenses, as workplace issues can have reporting requirements and regulatory implications beyond standard employment litigation.
Commercial litigators analyzing employee complaints that relate to business disputes, such as whistleblower claims about corporate misconduct or employee allegations connected to breach of contract cases.
Employee complaints often intersect with commercial litigation when they involve allegations of corporate wrongdoing, trade secret misappropriation, or business practices that form the basis of broader commercial disputes.
CaseMark can analyze any employment-related complaint including discrimination, harassment, retaliation, wrongful termination, wage and hour violations, FMLA claims, ADA accommodation disputes, and breach of contract allegations. The tool works with EEOC charges, internal grievances, demand letters, and formal complaints across all employment law practice areas.
CaseMark evaluates allegations against federal and state employment law frameworks including Title VII, ADA, ADEA, FMLA, and FLSA. It assesses the strength of claims based on available evidence, identifies potential exposure areas like punitive damages, flags pattern and practice concerns, and highlights procedural requirements such as EEOC deadlines. The analysis provides attorneys with actionable risk assessment to inform settlement and litigation strategy.
Yes, CaseMark analyzes multiple related documents simultaneously including the complaint itself, investigation reports, witness statements, emails, personnel files, and performance reviews. The tool cross-references information across all uploaded documents to build a comprehensive chronology, identify corroborating or contradictory evidence, and provide a complete factual picture of the workplace dispute.
CaseMark extracts facts directly from source documents with specific citations to document names and page numbers. All timeline entries, quoted statements, and factual assertions are traced to the uploaded materials, ensuring accuracy and verifiability. Attorneys can quickly verify any fact by reviewing the cited source, maintaining the same level of reliability as manual document review but in a fraction of the time.
CaseMark identifies gaps in the factual record and explicitly notes when key information is missing or unclear from the available documents. The summary includes recommendations for additional investigation, discovery needs, and follow-up inquiries to complete the case assessment. This helps attorneys develop targeted investigation plans and understand what additional evidence is needed to fully evaluate the complaint.