Contact
← All workflows

Change in Control Agreement

Draft Executive Change in Control Agreements in Minutes

12 minutes with CaseMark

Fast lane

We have it from here.

Choose the fast one-off run here, or jump into the workspace when you want saved history, revisions, and a fuller matter workflow.

Run this once here

Best for a quick one-off job. Add your email, upload the files, and we'll run the workflow and send the result to your inbox.

1. Add your email so we know where to send the result.

2. Upload the files you want analyzed.

3. Run the workflow and we'll take it from there.

Use in Workspace

Best for ongoing matters

Save and reopen matters, keep documents together, refine the output, rerun with changes, and export or share polished work product when you're done.

Open in Workspace

Need more context?

Scroll for the workflow details below if you want to review what this run handles, what documents help, and what the output looks like.

If this is part of a live matter, the workspace is the better fit: you can keep your documents together, revisit the result, and keep working without starting from scratch.

Jump to detailsOpen in Workspace

Start here

Run this workflow now

Best for a fast one-off run. Add your email, upload the files, and we'll deliver the result without sending you into the full app.

Workflow

Change in Control Agreement

Step 1 · Deliver to

Step 3 · Run this workflow

Workflow

Change in Control Agreement

Overview

Drafting change in control agreements manually requires hours of careful attention to complex definitions, severance calculations, equity acceleration terms, and Section 280G tax implications. Attorneys must balance executive protection with company interests while ensuring compliance with securities laws and tax regulations, often requiring multiple revisions and stakeholder reviews.

Change in control agreements require balancing complex tax regulations (280G, 409A), corporate governance standards, and executive retention needs. Attorneys spend 8+ hours navigating definitions, severance multiples, equity acceleration, and excise tax provisions while ensuring consistency with existing compensation arrangements and compliance with evolving institutional investor guidelines.

CaseMark analyzes your employment agreements, equity plans, and compensation policies to generate comprehensive change in control agreements with precise definitions, tax-compliant severance structures, and appropriate double-trigger protections. The AI ensures consistency across executives while customizing terms based on role, seniority, and company-specific requirements.

How it works

  1. 1. Upload your documents

  2. 2. AI analyzes and extracts key information

  3. 3. Review and customize the generated content

  4. 4. Export in your preferred format (DOCX, PDF)

What you get

  • Introduction and Parties

  • Purpose Statement

  • Definitions (Change in Control, Cause, Good Reason)

  • Qualifying Termination Events

  • Cash Severance Terms

  • Equity Acceleration Provisions

  • Benefits Continuation

  • Section 280G Excise Tax Treatment

  • Release Requirement

  • Governing Law

  • Signature Blocks

What it handles

  • Introduction and Parties

  • Purpose Statement

  • Definitions (Change in Control, Cause, Good Reason)

  • Qualifying Termination Events

  • Cash Severance Terms

  • Equity Acceleration Provisions

  • Benefits Continuation

  • Section 280G Excise Tax Treatment

  • Release Requirement

  • Governing Law

  • Signature Blocks

Required documents

  • Executive Employment Agreement

    Current employment agreement showing compensation structure, title, and existing terms

    PDF, DOCX

  • Company Equity Plan Documents

    Stock option plans, equity incentive plans, and outstanding award agreements

    PDF, DOCX

Supporting documents

  • Existing Change in Control Agreements

    Prior agreements with other executives for consistency and benchmarking

    PDF, DOCX

  • Compensation Committee Guidelines

    Board-approved policies on executive compensation and change in control protections

    PDF, DOCX

  • Proxy Statements

    Recent proxy disclosures showing compensation philosophy and peer benchmarking

    PDF

  • Restrictive Covenant Agreements

    Non-compete, non-solicitation, and confidentiality agreements currently in effect

    PDF, DOCX

Why teams use it

Generate complete agreements in 12 minutes vs. 4.5 hours manually

Automated Section 280G calculations with gross-up, cutback, or no gross-up options

Pre-drafted definitions for Change in Control, Cause, and Good Reason that comply with IRS regulations

Customizable severance multiples and equity acceleration terms based on executive level

Built-in compliance with securities law disclosure requirements and tax code provisions

Questions

What is the difference between single trigger and double trigger change in control agreements?

Single trigger agreements pay benefits immediately upon a change in control, regardless of whether the executive remains employed. Double trigger agreements require both a change in control and a qualifying termination (termination without cause or resignation for good reason) before benefits are paid. Double trigger structures are now the market standard because they avoid paying executives who remain employed post-transaction and are favored by institutional investors and proxy advisory firms.

How should severance multiples be determined in change in control agreements?

Severance multiples typically range from 1.0x to 3.0x the sum of base salary plus target bonus, depending on the executive's level and role. CEOs commonly receive 2.5x to 3.0x, other C-suite executives receive 1.5x to 2.0x, and senior vice presidents receive 1.0x to 1.5x. The multiple should reflect the executive's seniority, difficulty of replacement, and competitive market practices while considering institutional investor guidelines that disfavor excessive multiples.

What is Section 280G and how does it affect change in control agreements?

Section 280G disallows a company's tax deduction for 'excess parachute payments' that equal or exceed three times an executive's base amount (average five-year compensation). Section 4999 imposes a 20% excise tax on the executive receiving such payments. Modern agreements typically use a 'best net' cutback (reducing payments to 2.99x if that results in better after-tax proceeds) or a no-gross-up approach where the executive bears the excise tax. Full gross-up provisions, where the company pays the executive's excise tax, are now rare in newly negotiated agreements.

How should Good Reason be defined to protect executives without creating hair-trigger provisions?

Good Reason should include material diminution in authority/duties/responsibilities, material reduction in base salary or target bonus, and relocation beyond 35-50 miles. Critically, the definition must include procedural requirements: the executive must provide written notice within 60-90 days of the condition arising, the company gets 30 days to cure, and the executive must terminate within 30-60 days if not cured. These procedures prevent executives from stockpiling grievances or claiming Good Reason for stale or cured conditions.

How should equity acceleration be structured in change in control agreements?

Best practice is double-trigger acceleration where unvested equity accelerates only upon a qualifying termination during the protection period (typically 12-24 months post-change in control). For performance-based awards, specify whether vesting occurs at target, maximum, or actual performance through the change in control date. Extend post-termination exercise periods for stock options to 12-24 months (rather than the standard 90 days) to accommodate trading restrictions and tax planning. Single-trigger acceleration is increasingly disfavored by institutional investors.

Related

Access and Indemnity Agreement (Due Diligence)

Draft Property Access Agreements in Minutes with AI

Access Indemnity Agreement

Draft Access & Indemnity Agreements in Minutes

Ad Fund Agreement

Draft Ad Fund Agreements in Minutes, Not Hours