What you'll receive
Drafting amicus curiae briefs requires extensive case analysis, legal research, and strategic positioning to provide courts with genuinely new perspectives without duplicating party arguments. Attorneys spend weeks reviewing case files, conducting research, and ensuring procedural compliance while crafting submissions that stand out among dozens of competing briefs.
Drafting amicus curiae briefs requires extensive case analysis, legal research, and strategic positioning to provide courts with genuinely new perspectives without duplicating party arguments. Attorneys spend weeks reviewing case files, conducting research, and ensuring procedural compliance while crafting submissions that stand out among dozens of competing briefs.
CaseMark analyzes your case documents to identify legal gaps, conducts comprehensive research, and generates structured amicus briefs with proper citations and formatting. Our AI ensures your brief provides unique value to the court while meeting all procedural requirements and Bluebook citation standards.
This workflow is applicable across multiple practice areas and use cases
Environmental advocacy groups and industry associations frequently file amicus briefs in appellate cases involving EPA regulations, climate change litigation, and environmental permitting disputes.
Environmental law cases often attract multiple amicus submissions from NGOs, trade associations, and government entities seeking to influence regulatory interpretation and policy outcomes.
Medical associations, patient advocacy groups, and healthcare organizations regularly submit amicus briefs in appellate cases involving FDA regulations, healthcare policy, and medical malpractice standards.
Healthcare law appeals frequently involve complex regulatory and policy issues where industry groups and public health organizations provide expert perspectives through amicus briefs.
Labor unions, employer associations, and civil rights organizations file amicus briefs in employment discrimination, wage-hour, and labor relations appeals to shape workplace law precedent.
Employment litigation appeals often have broad implications for workplace rights and employer obligations, attracting amicus participation from stakeholder organizations on both sides.
Technology companies, privacy advocacy groups, and industry associations submit amicus briefs in appellate cases involving data protection regulations, surveillance law, and cybersecurity standards.
Privacy and cybersecurity appeals frequently involve novel legal questions where tech industry groups and civil liberties organizations provide technical expertise and policy perspectives.
Patent pools, industry standards organizations, and IP law associations file amicus briefs in patent, trademark, and copyright appeals to influence IP doctrine and innovation policy.
IP appeals often establish precedents affecting entire industries, making them prime targets for amicus participation from technology companies, creative industries, and IP stakeholder groups.
An amicus curiae or 'friend of the court' brief is a legal document filed by non-parties to a case who have a strong interest in the subject matter. These briefs provide courts with additional perspectives, expertise, or policy considerations that may not be fully addressed by the litigating parties. Amicus briefs are particularly common in appellate cases with broad implications for industries, public policy, or civil rights.
CaseMark analyzes the underlying case documents to understand the legal issues and arguments already presented by the parties. It then identifies gaps where your amicus perspective can provide unique value, conducts legal research to support your position, and generates a structured brief with proper citations and formatting. The AI ensures your submission complements rather than duplicates the parties' arguments while meeting all court requirements.
At minimum, you should upload the case pleadings and party briefs to help CaseMark understand the legal issues and existing arguments. Additional helpful documents include court rules for the specific jurisdiction, supporting research materials like industry reports or academic studies, and any organizational statements explaining your amicus interest in the case.
Yes, CaseMark generates all legal citations in Bluebook format, which is the standard for court filings. The AI verifies citation accuracy and ensures proper formatting for cases, statutes, regulations, and secondary sources. However, we recommend attorney review of all citations before filing to confirm current authority and verify source materials.
CaseMark provides guidance on common procedural requirements including page limits, formatting specifications, filing deadlines, and consent requirements. The AI generates a compliance checklist specific to your jurisdiction and highlights areas requiring attorney attention, such as obtaining party consent or seeking leave of court before filing.