← Back to workflows
Litigation General

Legal Research Summaries

Attorneys spend countless hours conducting legal research, combing through statutes, case law, and regulatory guidance to answer a single legal question. Manually synthesizing these sources into a coherent, actionable summary is time-intensive and expensive, often requiring multiple billable hours that delay case preparation and strategic decision-making.

Automation ROI

Time savings at a glance

Manual workflow8 hoursAverage time your team spends by hand
With CaseMark15 minutesDelivery time with CaseMark automation
EfficiencySave 32.0x time with CaseMark

The Problem

Attorneys spend countless hours conducting legal research, combing through statutes, case law, and regulatory guidance to answer a single legal question. Manually synthesizing these sources into a coherent, actionable summary is time-intensive and expensive, often requiring multiple billable hours that delay case preparation and strategic decision-making.

The CaseMark Solution

CaseMark generates comprehensive legal research summaries that synthesize statutory law, case law, and regulatory guidance into organized, actionable analyses. Get professional-quality research memoranda with proper citations, strategic considerations, and counterargument analysis in minutes, empowering faster and more informed legal decision-making.

What you'll receive

Executive Summary with Key Findings
Legal Question and Research Scope
Statutory Law Analysis
Case Law Review and Synthesis
Regulatory Guidance and Agency Interpretations
Counterarguments and Alternative Interpretations
Verified Citations in Bluebook Format
Practical Implications and Strategic Considerations

Document requirements

Required

  • Legal Question or Research Topic

Optional

  • Relevant Case Files
  • Prior Research Notes
  • Jurisdiction Parameters

Perfect for

Litigation Attorneys
Trial Lawyers
Associate Attorneys conducting research
Solo Practitioners
Legal Research Specialists
Appellate Attorneys
In-House Counsel

Also useful for

This workflow is applicable across multiple practice areas and use cases

Regulatory General95% relevant

Legal research summaries are essential for analyzing complex regulatory frameworks, agency guidance, and compliance requirements across all regulatory practice areas.

Regulatory attorneys constantly need to research statutes, regulations, and agency interpretations to advise clients on compliance matters, making this workflow highly applicable across all regulatory specialties.

Corporate General88% relevant

Corporate attorneys regularly need legal research summaries on entity formation requirements, corporate compliance obligations, contract law, and business regulations across jurisdictions.

General corporate practice involves diverse legal questions requiring research on statutes, case law, and regulatory guidance to advise business clients on formation, operations, and compliance matters.

Securities attorneys require research summaries on SEC regulations, exemptions, disclosure requirements, and case law interpreting securities statutes for offerings and compliance matters.

Securities law is highly complex and constantly evolving through SEC rulemaking and court decisions, requiring thorough legal research to navigate registration, disclosure, and enforcement issues.

M&A attorneys require legal research summaries to analyze regulatory approval requirements, antitrust issues, securities law compliance, and jurisdictional legal frameworks for transactions.

Complex M&A transactions require extensive legal research across multiple practice areas including corporate, securities, tax, and antitrust law to identify legal risks and structure deals appropriately.

Corporate governance attorneys need research summaries on fiduciary duties, shareholder rights, securities regulations, and evolving corporate law standards to advise boards and management.

Corporate governance practice requires staying current with case law developments on director duties, regulatory guidance from SEC and other agencies, and statutory changes affecting corporate decision-making.

Frequently asked questions

Q

How does CaseMark ensure the legal research is comprehensive and accurate?

A

CaseMark analyzes multiple categories of legal authority including statutory law, binding and persuasive case law, and regulatory guidance. All authorities are cited in proper Bluebook format with verified sources, and the system explicitly notes any gaps in available authority or unverified citations. The analysis distinguishes between settled legal principles and areas of ongoing development to ensure accuracy and completeness.

Q

What makes this different from just getting a list of case citations?

A

CaseMark goes beyond citation collection by providing integrated thematic analysis that shows how statutes, cases, and regulations interact. Each summary includes analysis of legal tensions, counterarguments, strategic considerations, and practical implications. You receive actionable intelligence about how the law applies to your specific question, not just a list of sources to review manually.

Q

Can I use these research summaries directly in my legal work?

A

Yes, CaseMark produces professional-quality research summaries structured for immediate use in case preparation, motion drafting, and strategic planning. Each summary includes an executive summary, organized legal analysis, proper citations, and practical implications. However, as with all legal research tools, attorneys should review and verify the analysis as part of their professional responsibility.

Q

How does the tool handle multiple jurisdictions or conflicting authorities?

A

CaseMark identifies and analyzes conflicts between jurisdictions, presenting each viewpoint with supporting authority and evaluating the relative strength of each position. The summaries prioritize binding precedent from the relevant jurisdiction while noting persuasive authority from other jurisdictions. When courts are divided or the law is unclear, the analysis presents multiple interpretations in a balanced manner to support informed decision-making.