What you'll receive
Expert witnesses can overlook or ignore critical medical records that undermine their testimony, whether inadvertently or strategically. Manually cross-referencing hundreds of pages of expert reports against thousands of medical records is time-consuming and prone to missing crucial omissions. Missing these gaps can mean lost opportunities for devastating cross-examination or successful Daubert...
Expert witnesses can overlook or ignore critical medical records that undermine their testimony, whether inadvertently or strategically. Manually cross-referencing hundreds of pages of expert reports against thousands of medical records is time-consuming and prone to missing crucial omissions. Missing these gaps can mean lost opportunities for devastating cross-examination or successful Daubert challenges.
CaseMark automatically analyzes expert witness reports and depositions against your complete medical record set to identify every omission, contradiction, and gap in their review. Within minutes, you receive a comprehensive report with specific citations, significance ratings, and ready-to-use cross-examination questions that would take your team days to compile manually.
This workflow is applicable across multiple practice areas and use cases
Employment litigation cases involving workplace injuries, disability discrimination, or workers' compensation often require expert medical witness testimony that must be scrutinized for omissions and inconsistencies.
Medical expert witnesses frequently testify in employment cases regarding work-related injuries, disability accommodations, and fitness for duty evaluations, making this workflow directly applicable for cross-examination preparation and Daubert challenges.
Healthcare regulatory matters and licensing disputes often involve expert witness testimony regarding standard of care, medical record documentation, and professional conduct that requires detailed analysis.
Healthcare law practitioners defending or prosecuting medical board actions, licensing disputes, and regulatory compliance matters frequently need to analyze expert medical testimony and identify gaps in medical record reviews.
Commercial disputes involving healthcare businesses, medical device liability, or pharmaceutical litigation require expert witness analysis of medical records and testimony regarding product safety and efficacy.
Commercial litigation in healthcare-adjacent industries often involves medical expert witnesses whose testimony must be evaluated for completeness and accuracy, particularly in product liability and business tort cases.
Criminal defense cases involving assault, homicide, or medical fraud charges often require analysis of medical expert testimony regarding injuries, cause of death, or medical billing practices.
Defense attorneys in criminal cases frequently challenge prosecution medical experts and need to identify omissions in medical record reviews to establish reasonable doubt or challenge expert credibility.
CaseMark cross-references the expert's stated materials reviewed against your complete medical record set, identifying any documents not mentioned or cited. The system analyzes expert reports, depositions, and testimony to catalog what the expert claims to have reviewed, then compares this against every document in your case file. It flags discrepancies, missing records, and documents that contradict the expert's conclusions.
Yes, CaseMark provides a detailed methodology review that assesses whether omissions affect the reliability and foundation of the expert's opinion. The analysis identifies patterns of selective review, gaps in the expert's stated methodology, and omissions that could undermine admissibility under Daubert or Frye standards. You receive specific findings that can support motions to exclude or limit expert testimony based on incomplete or flawed review processes.
CaseMark identifies all types of omitted medical documentation including clinical notes, diagnostic test results, imaging reports, lab work, treatment records, prescriptions, and specialist consultations. The system categorizes omissions by significance, highlighting records that contradict the expert's opinion, document pre-existing conditions, provide alternative causation theories, or reveal treatment decisions the expert failed to address.
CaseMark generates your complete analysis including targeted cross-examination questions in approximately 25 minutes, compared to 18+ hours of manual review. The system provides ready-to-use question frameworks organized by omission type and significance, with specific citations to both the expert's statements and the overlooked records. You can immediately begin trial preparation with a structured roadmap for challenging the expert's credibility and thoroughness.
Absolutely. CaseMark helps you proactively identify potential weaknesses in your own expert's review before opposing counsel does. You can ensure your expert has reviewed all relevant materials, address any gaps before deposition, and prepare your expert to explain their methodology comprehensively. This defensive use prevents surprises during cross-examination and strengthens the admissibility of your expert's testimony.