What's in a Name? The CaseMark Story

Building successful companies taught us that the best names reflect not just what we do, but how we think about building.

2
 min. read
July 20, 2025
What's in a Name? The CaseMark Story

Names matter. They stick with you, shape perceptions, and sometimes even become verbs. When we set out to name CaseMark, we knew we had one shot to get it right.

The Art of Naming

My journey with naming began years ago as a sysadmin. Back then, naming was more than a task; it was a rite of passage. The first two things I ever named were printers for our college computer lab: Ren & Stimpy. In those days, before the era of sterile designations like sw1-or-pdx-22.ext.blahblahblah.com, developing a naming methodology meant crafting something clever, quippy, or just plain funny.

Having named several companies over the years (though I can't claim credit for Urban Airship), we understood that in the legal tech space, memorable mattered more than ever.

Starting Small, Thinking Smart

Here's an unpopular opinion: I'm skeptical of grand visions. Maybe it's a character flaw. Maybe If we just talked some more sh*t about what we’re building we’d probably 10x our valuation. I've seen firsthand how taking too much money too early can derail a company's trajectory. We've been down that road before.

Instead, we believe in starting simple and letting customer needs guide our growth. Every successful company we've built followed this pattern:

  • Urban Airship began with basic push notifications
  • Odava started as a simple point-of-sale system
  • Bac'n literally just sold bacon on the internet
  • CaseMark launched with one feature: deposition summaries

From Simple to Essential

We chose CaseMark because we wanted something that could become a verb. We wanted legal professionals to naturally say: "Just CaseMark it." The name is memorable, practical, and when the opportunity arose to secure the .com domain (through a combination of strategic bluffing and a 12-hour cash offer), we knew we had our brand.

Our initial offering of deposition summaries wasn't designed to attract venture capital or boast about massive market potential. It was designed to solve a real problem for real customers utilizing AI in the most effective way. When those early users asked for more, we listened. We added trial summaries, hearing summaries, arbitration summaries, and exhibit lists. Each feature built naturally on the last. Every new feature allowed us to expand our understanding and use of AI helping build a compelling narrative for our customers.

The Litigation Lifecycle Vision

This organic growth revealed our true opportunity: transforming the entire Litigation Lifecycle. By creating "easy buttons" for every stage from intake through settlement, appeal, or verdict, CaseMark could become the first tool legal professionals reach for each morning.

Our vision isn't about disrupting the legal industry with grandiose promises. It's about delivering immediate value from day one, then earning the right to solve bigger problems. When attorneys ask themselves "What can I CaseMark today?" we want the answer to be: anything that makes their practice more efficient.

The Power of Patient Building

CaseMark represents our belief that the best companies grow from solving specific problems exceptionally well. We didn't need a massive TAM or VCs clamoring to invest. We needed customers who found value in our work and wanted more. We needed to prove to them that AI can be used effectively on a daily basis. Often times the best products don’t actually feel like you’re using them.

That's the CaseMark way: Start small. Solve real problems. Let customer needs drive expansion. Build just enough that is so useful it becomes a verb.

Because in the end, that's what's in a name: not just clever wordplay, but a promise to make legal work better, one feature at a time.

What's in a Name? The CaseMark Story

Building successful companies taught us that the best names reflect not just what we do, but how we think about building.

2
 min. read
July 20, 2025
What's in a Name? The CaseMark Story

Names matter. They stick with you, shape perceptions, and sometimes even become verbs. When we set out to name CaseMark, we knew we had one shot to get it right.

The Art of Naming

My journey with naming began years ago as a sysadmin. Back then, naming was more than a task; it was a rite of passage. The first two things I ever named were printers for our college computer lab: Ren & Stimpy. In those days, before the era of sterile designations like sw1-or-pdx-22.ext.blahblahblah.com, developing a naming methodology meant crafting something clever, quippy, or just plain funny.

Having named several companies over the years (though I can't claim credit for Urban Airship), we understood that in the legal tech space, memorable mattered more than ever.

Starting Small, Thinking Smart

Here's an unpopular opinion: I'm skeptical of grand visions. Maybe it's a character flaw. Maybe If we just talked some more sh*t about what we’re building we’d probably 10x our valuation. I've seen firsthand how taking too much money too early can derail a company's trajectory. We've been down that road before.

Instead, we believe in starting simple and letting customer needs guide our growth. Every successful company we've built followed this pattern:

  • Urban Airship began with basic push notifications
  • Odava started as a simple point-of-sale system
  • Bac'n literally just sold bacon on the internet
  • CaseMark launched with one feature: deposition summaries

From Simple to Essential

We chose CaseMark because we wanted something that could become a verb. We wanted legal professionals to naturally say: "Just CaseMark it." The name is memorable, practical, and when the opportunity arose to secure the .com domain (through a combination of strategic bluffing and a 12-hour cash offer), we knew we had our brand.

Our initial offering of deposition summaries wasn't designed to attract venture capital or boast about massive market potential. It was designed to solve a real problem for real customers utilizing AI in the most effective way. When those early users asked for more, we listened. We added trial summaries, hearing summaries, arbitration summaries, and exhibit lists. Each feature built naturally on the last. Every new feature allowed us to expand our understanding and use of AI helping build a compelling narrative for our customers.

The Litigation Lifecycle Vision

This organic growth revealed our true opportunity: transforming the entire Litigation Lifecycle. By creating "easy buttons" for every stage from intake through settlement, appeal, or verdict, CaseMark could become the first tool legal professionals reach for each morning.

Our vision isn't about disrupting the legal industry with grandiose promises. It's about delivering immediate value from day one, then earning the right to solve bigger problems. When attorneys ask themselves "What can I CaseMark today?" we want the answer to be: anything that makes their practice more efficient.

The Power of Patient Building

CaseMark represents our belief that the best companies grow from solving specific problems exceptionally well. We didn't need a massive TAM or VCs clamoring to invest. We needed customers who found value in our work and wanted more. We needed to prove to them that AI can be used effectively on a daily basis. Often times the best products don’t actually feel like you’re using them.

That's the CaseMark way: Start small. Solve real problems. Let customer needs drive expansion. Build just enough that is so useful it becomes a verb.

Because in the end, that's what's in a name: not just clever wordplay, but a promise to make legal work better, one feature at a time.

Summary Type
Best for Case Types
Primary Purpose
Complexity Handling
Production Time
Best for Team Members
Key Information Highlighted
Narrative
General; personal injury
Initial review; client communication
Low to Medium
Medium
All; Clients
Overall story
Page Line
Complex litigation
Detailed analysis; trial prep
High
Low
Attorneys
Specific testimony details
Topical
Multi-faceted cases
Case strategy; trial prep
High
Medium
Attorneys; Paralegals
Theme-based information
Q&A
Witness credibility cases
Cross-examination prep
Medium
High
Attorneys
Context of statements
Chronological
Timeline-critical cases
Establishing sequence of events
Medium
High
All
Event timeline
Highlight and extract
All
Quick reference; key points
Low to Medium
High
Senior Attorneys
Critical statements
Comparative
Multi-witness cases
Consistency check
High
Low
Attorneys; Paralegals
Discrepancies; Agreements
Annotated
Complex legal issues
Training; in-depth analysis
High
Low
Junior Associates; Paralegals
Legal implications
Visual
Jury presentations
Client / jury communication
Low to Medium
Medium
All; Clients; Jury
Visual representation of key points
Summary Grid
Multi-witness; fact-heavy cases
Organized reference
High
Medium
All
Categorized information